Re: arm build hardware

To: ARM <debian-arm@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: arm build hardware
From: peter green <plugwash@p10link.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 23:16:42 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 514108DA.5030504@p10link.net>
In-reply-to: <DDFC844F-9A85-40FD-8F00-0983524F4145@night-shade.org.uk>
References: <[🔎] 513A37D4.9010103@p10link.net> <DDFC844F-9A85-40FD-8F00-0983524F4145@night-shade.org.uk>

Tim Fletcher wrote:

The cubox pro, 2gb of ram and esata. Fromhere:http://www.newit.co.uk/shop/proddetail.php?prod=CuBoxPro

Seems very weak on the CPU

The other option is the mirabox which is only 1gb of ram but has realmini pcie slots. Available here:http://www.newit.co.uk/shop/proddetail.php?prod=Mirabox

1GB of ram is simply unacceptable for an autobuilder nowadays.

After the bad stuff i'm reading about the arndaleboard (apparentlyproblems even at 1.4 GHz despite the advertised speed being 1.8 GHz) i'mthinking the 2GB nitrogen6x is the best option right now.

Has anyone here hammered on a nitrogen6x or similar board? is it stableat the advertised 1GHz with all cores loaded?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: arm build hardware
  - From: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>

References:
- arm build hardware
  - From: peter green <plugwash@p10link.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Case for ARM-based system and single 3.5" hard disk?
Next by Date: Re: Case for ARM-based system and single 3.5" hard disk?
Previous by thread: Re: arm build hardware
Next by thread: Re: arm build hardware
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread