Re: Help making a decision on re-basing Slackware ARM from armv4 to armv5

To: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Help making a decision on re-basing Slackware ARM from armv4 to armv5
From: Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 07:52:32 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 4EE99930.1060702@linaro.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4EE961EB.8040203@ss.org>
References: <[🔎] alpine.LNX.2.00.1112141548120.307@bourbon.biscuit.org.uk> <[🔎] 20111214221710.GB28260@dream.aleph1.co.uk> <[🔎] 4EE95E83.4060309@BitWagon.com> <[🔎] 4EE961EB.8040203@ss.org>

W dniu 15.12.2011 03:56, Scott Sullivan pisze:

The Pandaboard and Beagle board are also armv5tel as well, to the best
of my memory.


they are v7

That family of devices has reached consumer critical mass and has a
large community of users. Fedora is continuing it's v5tel efforts for
those and other similar reasons.

There are some NAS devices based on EP93xx cpu family (v4t), some cheapnice devboards like FriendlyArm ones are also v4t.

Reply to:

References:
- Help making a decision on re-basing Slackware ARM from armv4 to armv5
  - From: Stuart Winter <m-lists@biscuit.org.uk>
- Re: Help making a decision on re-basing Slackware ARM from armv4 to armv5
  - From: Wookey <wookey@wookware.org>
- Re: Help making a decision on re-basing Slackware ARM from armv4 to armv5
  - From: John Reiser <vendor@BitWagon.com>
- Re: Help making a decision on re-basing Slackware ARM from armv4 to armv5
  - From: Scott Sullivan <scott@ss.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Help making a decision on re-basing Slackware ARM from armv4 to armv5
Next by Date: Re: "struct user" conflicts on armel and armfh
Previous by thread: Re: Help making a decision on re-basing Slackware ARM from armv4 to armv5
Next by thread: Re: Help making a decision on re-basing Slackware ARM from armv4 to armv5
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread