[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dpkg armhf patch acceptance status?



On 18 February 2011 06:27, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> wrote:
 ... and in the meantime, markos is under pressure to manually
maintain everything _without_ a delta-management tool, which puts
ongoing and ever-increasing pressure on what he can reasonably handle,
whilst those discussions are underway.  re-read what he wrote.  he's
effectively asking that the dpkg patch (which isn't acceptable as it
stands) be hurried up, because he's got a ton of stuff that's being
added to daily, piling up behind it.

I appreciate that you are worrying about the pressure I'm under, but I'll handle it,
it's not that bad. Things have become much smoother, the patches are in the BTS,
next week we'll do porterNMUs for the unfixed packages, and the only thing I really
worry about is java support and d-i armhf integration. We're already in the 87% of
the archive and the todo list gets shorter all the time.

Anyway, please feel free to take some time off and work on a PoC for what you
mean, if you're afraid that people don't understand your words, you can be certain
that they'll understand your code. Until then, I really find this discussion pointless.

Konstantinos

Reply to: