Re: Reports of successful Squeeze upgrades
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 11:30 +0100, Groug wrote:
> On 02/24/2011 06:45 PM, Gordon Farquharson wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 07:07, Groug<email@example.com> wrote:
> >> I have (or better say had) a nslu2 running lenny. I've dist-upgraded
> >> to squeeze: no errors but the nslu2 won't reboot: during the boot
> >> sequence, the usb hard disk gets shutdowned and nothing more
> >> happens. Fortunately, I could restore the flash with a working lenny
> >> image. For the moment, I have squeeze running on a lenny kernel...
> >> I'd like to investigate. Does anyone has a suggestion ?
> > I did a full upgrade from lenny to squeeze yesterday and it worked
> > without a problem. I followed the upgrade procedure recommended in the
> > release notes . Specifically, I did the minimal system upgrade,
> > then upgraded udev and the kernel, and then did a full upgrade.
> > Does your system have a RAID or are you using LVM? Also, did you do
> No LVM, no raid.
> > the conversion from device-based naming to UUID-based naming? Are you
> Yes, UUID-based naming in /etc/fstab at least. Is there another file to
> update ?
> > sure that you have upgraded both udev and the kernel? According to the
> > release notes, the squeeze udev will not work properly with the lenny
> Ouch... I missed that and now I have lenny kernel and squeeze udev.
> Could this
> prevent update-initramfs to build a bootable image for the squeeze kernel ?
> > kernel. Do you have a rootdelay parameter set for your lenny kernel
> > command line? If so, you will need to set that parameter again for the
> > squeeze image using apex-env.
> No rootdelay.
> > Gordon
> >  http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/armel/release-notes/
Success at last !
I had to turn MODULES=dep to MODULES=most in initramfs... This is what I
had with dep:
I wonder what modules were missing...
"Etre français est-ce que c'est devoir parler français,
chanter la Marseillaise, lire la lettre de Guy Môquet ?
Ça c'est être con !" -- Eric Cantona