Re: armelfp: new architecture name for an armel variant

To: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: armelfp: new architecture name for an armel variant
From: Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:27:22 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20100709182722.GB18726@bee.dooz.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] AANLkTikd4iT6ImKDQZS62pqF3n68CLdO7lUhapBBYQaR@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] AANLkTimoAsV_lxMTplp3aQv9vDM5Gx-31tU7pqnI6k-e@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20100706183616.GV7897@dream.aleph1.co.uk> <[🔎] 20100708181622.GQ7897@dream.aleph1.co.uk> <[🔎] 20100709143740.GC14789@bee.dooz.org> <[🔎] AANLkTikLCd47HHfFbwni2divkRZ1bhx7mJ-Jx-BN02gb@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20100709172937.GA23668@scru.org> <[🔎] AANLkTikd4iT6ImKDQZS62pqF3n68CLdO7lUhapBBYQaR@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jul 09, 2010, Hector Oron wrote:
> Somebody against 'armhf'? Have we got it?
>   arm-hardfloat-linux-gnueabi

 Sounds good

>   armhf-linux-gnueabi

 Oh no, not the CPU field; it really can only go in vendor

-- 
Loïc Minier

Reply to:

References:
- armelfp: new architecture name for an armel variant
  - From: Hector Oron <hector.oron@gmail.com>
- Re: armelfp: new architecture name for an armel variant
  - From: Wookey <wookey@wookware.org>
- Re: armelfp: new architecture name for an armel variant
  - From: Wookey <wookey@wookware.org>
- Re: armelfp: new architecture name for an armel variant
  - From: Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
- Re: armelfp: new architecture name for an armel variant
  - From: Hector Oron <hector.oron@gmail.com>
- Re: armelfp: new architecture name for an armel variant
  - From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: armelfp: new architecture name for an armel variant
  - From: Hector Oron <hector.oron@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: armelfp: new architecture name for an armel variant
Next by Date: Re: armelfp: new architecture name for an armel variant
Previous by thread: Re: armelfp: new architecture name for an armel variant
Next by thread: Re: armelfp: new architecture name for an armel variant
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread