Re: Can someone still help with install
Hi Markus
On 4/18/07, Markus Knapp <markus@markus-knapp.de> wrote:
I don't think it is a IPv6 problem.
I think that it has to be an IPv6 problem because of the following log
messages that you posted to debian-boot:
Apr 14 13:25:00 base-installer: Err http://ftp.se.debian.org etch
Release.gpg
Apr 14 13:25:00 base-installer: Could not create a socket for
2001:6b0:e:2018::137 (f=10 t=1 p=6) - socket (97 Address family not
supported by protocol) [IP: 2001:6b0:e:2018::137 80]
Apr 14 13:27:01 base-installer: Ign http://ftp.se.debian.org etch Release
Apr 14 13:29:02 base-installer: Ign http://ftp.se.debian.org etch/main
Packages/DiffIndex
Apr 14 13:31:03 base-installer: Err http://ftp.se.debian.org etch/main
Packages
Apr 14 13:31:03 base-installer: Could not create a socket for
2001:6b0:e:2018::137 (f=10 t=1 p=6) - socket (97 Address family not
supported by protocol) [IP: 2001:6b0:e:2018::137 80]
Apr 14 13:31:03 base-installer: Reading package lists...
Apr 14 13:31:03 base-installer: Failed to fetch
http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian/dists/etch/Release.gpg Could not create
a socket for 2001:6b0:e:2018::137 (f=10 t=1 p=6) - socket (97 Address
family not supported by protocol) [IP: 2001:6b0:e:2018::137 80]
Apr 14 13:31:03 base-installer: Failed to fetch
http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian/dist...rm/Packages.gz Could not create a
socket for 2001:6b0:e:2018::137 (f=10 t=1 p=6) - socket (97 Address
family not supported by protocol) [IP: 2001:6b0:e:2018::137 80]
Apr 14 13:32:00 base-installer:
Apr 14 13:32:00 base-installer: E: Some index files failed to download,
they have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
Apr 14 13:32:01 base-installer: warning: apt update failed: 100
Here a part of my syslog from a later try with another mirror:
Apr 16 22:00:51 base-installer: Could not connect to
ftp.nl.debian.org:80 (1.0.0.0), connection timed out
It looks like the installer has lost DNS for this mirror.
In this log, did you get any messages like the ones previously? It
could be that the system is unable to resolve the address, because of
the IPv6 issue.
Gordon
--
Gordon Farquharson
Reply to: