[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gnuab.org unreleased analysis


On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 18:32:37 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> The following packages in unreleased have older versions than unstable
> and the new versions don't have the armel patch applied. I filed bugs
> on several of these since the patch wasn't in the BTS. We probably should
> update the versions in unreleased in the meantime:
> gdb 6.6.dfsg-1+armel
> gettext 0.16.1-1+armel
> libtool 1.5.22-4+armel
> nspr 2.6.18-7+armel
> python-numeric 24.2-7+armel
> 	Changelog for the +armel version says "Disable lapack and blas
> 	support.", but it was a binary-only upload so I don't know what
> 	changes were made to the source and couldn't produce a patch.
> 	This needs to be dealt with.

Hmm this should not have happened, stuff to unreleased should always
be uploaded with sources. I might add a reject check for this.

> The following packages in the unreleased suite on gnuab.org seem like
> cruft that can be removed soon:
> gcc-defaults 1.56+armel
> 	Newer version in unstable has the armel patches.
> 	But new version hasn't built on armel yet for some reason.
> procpc 1:3.2.7-4.1+armel
> 	Fix just NMUed into unstable today, can remove from unreleased
> 	once it autobuilds for armel.

Those will be automatically obsoleted once the new version appears in
unstable (unreleased and unstable are considered part of the same
suite when obsoleting packages).

> linux-kernel-headers 2.6.18-7+armel
> 	Removed from unstable.

Removed now.


Reply to: