Re: Need help with uml-utilities
It is better because it doesn't include a whole bunch of modules
which can never work on a netwinder, is about 1/3 the size of
the standard one, and it realizes the full potential of the
Netwinder cyberpro2000 framebuffer. I could probably file a
bug, but I have never used stock debian kernels ever except
for initial installations. I just figure that everybody else
rebuilds their kernel too as a matter of course. Besides, there
are a whole lot of arm variations besides the Netwinder, and they
are growing as we speak! The stock kernel is not buggy, it just
is not optimal.
- Doug
Philip Blundell wrote:
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 11:07, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
I have a custom kernel-headers deb package for 2.4.16
on my web page http://webpages.charter.net/bdhilton/arm.html
but I am not a Debian developer (yet) and I just made it for my
Netwinder. I made it with make-kpkg, and it is a lot better
than the default debian netwinder kernel.
In what ways is it better? If you file a bug against the arm kernel
package, perhaps we can include those changes in the Debian kernels.
p.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: