Re: Need help with uml-utilities
Oh right, yeah. I see. In that case there probably isn't much point
filing bugs, except possibly for the cyberpro2000 thing.
The idea is that the prepackaged kernels should work well enough that
people aren't obliged to build their own if they don't want to.
Practically speaking, I suspect that most users do end up compiling a
custom kernel at the moment. It's interesting in a way that there is
this culture of building a kernel yourself being the right thing to do,
whereas a lot of people would strongly resist the idea of compiling
their own X server for example.
p.
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 11:25, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
> It is better because it doesn't include a whole bunch of modules
> which can never work on a netwinder, is about 1/3 the size of
> the standard one, and it realizes the full potential of the
> Netwinder cyberpro2000 framebuffer. I could probably file a
> bug, but I have never used stock debian kernels ever except
> for initial installations. I just figure that everybody else
> rebuilds their kernel too as a matter of course. Besides, there
> are a whole lot of arm variations besides the Netwinder, and they
> are growing as we speak! The stock kernel is not buggy, it just
> is not optimal.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: