Re: what's up with this?

[Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct@mit.edu>]

Philip Blundell wrote:

> >In other words, you don't install xpm4g when you have xlibs 4.0.2 installed,
> >nor, I suppose, xpm4g-dev when you have xlibs-dev.
>
> Ah, hmm.  So what about the packages that mention xpm4g in their Build-Depends?
> Should xlibs "Provide" xpm4g as well as libxpm4?

I think the packages are supposed to Build-Depend on libxpm4-dev instead.  One of
my bug reports suggesting a Build-Depends list for a package included xpm4g-dev,
and another maintainer corrected it.  So it sounds like a bug report is in order.

Zeen,

-Adam P.

GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

               Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe!