Re: what's up with this?

To: Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct@mit.edu>
Cc: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: what's up with this?
From: Philip Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 07:38:03 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] E14PgDr-0002U2-00@kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org>
In-reply-to: Message from Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct@mit.edu> of "Sun, 04 Feb 2001 21:02:12 EST." <[🔎] 3A7E09A3.CCFBCC02@mit.edu>
References: <[🔎] E14P5dM-0003Ie-00@kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org> <[🔎] 3A7E09A3.CCFBCC02@mit.edu>

>In other words, you don't install xpm4g when you have xlibs 4.0.2 installed,
>nor, I suppose, xpm4g-dev when you have xlibs-dev.

Ah, hmm.  So what about the packages that mention xpm4g in their Build-Depends?
Should xlibs "Provide" xpm4g as well as libxpm4?

Thanks

p.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: what's up with this?
  - From: Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct@mit.edu>

References:
- what's up with this?
  - From: Philip Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
- Re: what's up with this?
  - From: Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct@mit.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: what's up with this?
Next by Date: Re: BUG: gcc broken
Previous by thread: Re: what's up with this?
Next by thread: Re: what's up with this?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread