Re: lablgtk package not built ?
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 11:06:39AM +0100, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 10:53:36AM +0100, Sven wrote:
> > I am the maintainer of, under others, the lablgtk package, which altough
> > uploaded to unstable on september the 24, is not yet built on either arm or
> > sparc, and thus there is no version of lablgtk in woody.
> uh, check buildd.debian.org for the sparc/arm logs ... there are
> any problems with compilation listed, if it's such a thing,
> otherwise probably some other dependency issues or somesuch?
As for sparc, i remember now, lablgl-0.95-2 should be removed for sparc, as it
is badly built.
Should i redo a package (lablgl-0.95-3) and have all the subarches rebuild
just because sparc and maybe arm did build the package with the wrong version
of ocaml ?
Sve n LUther