Re: gpg fails!

[Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct@mit.edu>]

Adam C Powell IV wrote:

> I'm currently building 1.0.4-2, but if -1 doesn't work, then is there hope for
> -2?  Maybe when it's built with the new compiler/toolchain?

Nope, -2 fails in the same way... :-(

I'll keep building packages, and debsign their .changes and upload all at once
when gpg works.

Oh well,

-Adam P.

GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

              Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe!