Re: Built shadow things (and some glibc bits)

[Jim Pick <jim@jimpick.com>]

Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org> writes:

> BTW, I am currently working on glibc 2.0.96, and I'm wondering if I should 
> add arm to the "HAS_LIBC5" variable (this is currently used for some 
> conditionals, the first (depending on whether $HAS_LIBC contains the 
> current architecture as a component) is whether or not a pre-depends on 
> ldso (for the libc5 ld.so (ld-linux.so.1) and libc5-supporting ldd) is 
> necessary, the second (depending on whether $HAS_LIBC contains the current 
> architecture as a component) builds and installs ldconfig and ldd from the 
> glibc sources.

There isn't a libc5 for the ARM, so I don't think so.

You might want to look at the "broken" glibc stuff I did:

  ftp://ftp.jimpick.com/pub/debian/netwinder/prelim/glibc-broken/

I think I got most of the packaging more-or-less correct.  But I'm
having problems with the generated ld.so.

Cheers,

 - Jim