Re: Built shadow things (and some glibc bits)
>BTW, I am currently working on glibc 2.0.96, and I'm wondering if I should
>add arm to the "HAS_LIBC5" variable (this is currently used for some
>conditionals, the first (depending on whether $HAS_LIBC contains the
>current architecture as a component) is whether or not a pre-depends on
>ldso (for the libc5 ld.so (ld-linux.so.1) and libc5-supporting ldd) is
>necessary, the second (depending on whether $HAS_LIBC contains the current
>architecture as a component) builds and installs ldconfig and ldd from the
>glibc sources.
I don't think so. ARM uses the glibc ld.so and its friends. There never was
a libc.so.5 for the ARM, in fact.
p.
Reply to: