[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: apache2 wheezy backport


On 21.09.2013 23:27, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> That would be a rather large piece of work. It would be incompatible 
> with basically all apache modules and web-app packages in wheezy, so 
> those would need backporting, too. Considering that there is still 
> plenty of work to do in jessie, I don't think a backport will happen 
> anytime soon.

I do not think this will _ever_ happen. An Apache 2.4 backport would
trigger a massive chain of reverse dependencies which need a backport,
too (we talk about 250+ packages here). This is a massive change of
Wheezy which is not conforming to backport policies.

with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: