Re: What is the reason of using apache2.conf instead of httpd.conf?
* Daniel Stone (email@example.com) disait :
> httpd.conf is supported as well. The idea was that apache2.conf would
> be a tiny, minimal file that users never needed to change, while
> httpd.conf would remain for user customisations. This is because people
> would often customise some of the more ridiculous settings in
> httpd.conf, and then get annoyed when dpkg prompted them to ask what to
> do about it when it changed upstream. At least, speaking as the guy who
> made this change, that was my motivation.
Then, in a way, httpd.conf is a kind of .local conffile now?
Alexis Sukrieh <firstname.lastname@example.org>
« Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. »
Whatever is said in Latin sounds profound.