[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Re: What is the reason of using apache2.conf instead of httpd.conf?
To
: Daniel Stone <
daniel@fooishbar.org
>
Cc
:
debian-apache@lists.debian.org
Subject
: Re: What is the reason of using apache2.conf instead of httpd.conf?
From
: Lengyel Róbert <
len@freemail.hu
>
Date
: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 16:57:54 +0100
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
002801c53eaf$39a3c440$311a268a@bspc49
>
References
: <
[🔎]
001401c53eaa$74b04a40$311a268a@bspc49
> <
[🔎]
20050411154957.GR8521@catsby.fooishbar.org
>
I see, so every change can go to httpd.conf as usually. Thanks for your
answer.
Reply to:
debian-apache@lists.debian.org
Lengyel Róbert (on-list)
Lengyel Róbert (off-list)
References
:
What is the reason of using apache2.conf instead of httpd.conf?
From:
Lengyel Róbert <len@jaguar.unideb.hu>
Re: What is the reason of using apache2.conf instead of httpd.conf?
From:
Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Prev by Date:
Re: What is the reason of using apache2.conf instead of httpd.conf?
Next by Date:
Bug#304272: apache2-common: Why no mod_status?
Previous by thread:
Re: What is the reason of using apache2.conf instead of httpd.conf?
Next by thread:
Re: What is the reason of using apache2.conf instead of httpd.conf?
Index(es):
Date
Thread