Bug#268569: suexec to use PAM

To: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fabbione@fabbione.net>
Cc: 268569@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#268569: suexec to use PAM
From: Ognyan Kulev <ogi@fmi.uni-sofia.bg>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 15:31:33 +0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 41307B25.8010905@fmi.uni-sofia.bg>
Reply-to: Ognyan Kulev <ogi@fmi.uni-sofia.bg>, 268569@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.58.0408280949200.22323@trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net>
References: <[🔎] 41302DF5.8050304@fmi.uni-sofia.bg> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.58.0408280949200.22323@trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net>

Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:

We had to remove pam_limit (that is only a limited part of PAM support)
from suexec because it breaks horribly and it makes very very hard for an
admin to configure.

The only thing I found in Google is about uids < 1000. Could youprovide Google search string or something more concrete about theseproblems?


Regards,
ogi

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug#268569: suexec to use PAM
  - From: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fabbione@fabbione.net>

References:
- Bug#268569: suexec to use PAM
  - From: Ognyan Kulev <ogi@fmi.uni-sofia.bg>
- Re: Bug#268569: suexec to use PAM
  - From: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fabbione@fabbione.net>

Prev by Date: Bug#268579: apache2: segfault in default install
Next by Date: Processed: Re: Unresolved symbol
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#268569: suexec to use PAM
Next by thread: Re: Bug#268569: suexec to use PAM
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread