Bug#170943: marked as done (The cronscript doesn't rotate logfiles defined in Included files in Included files)
Your message dated Tue, 14 Oct 2003 17:36:56 +0100
with message-id <20031014163656.GX27861@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
and subject line We use logrotate now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Nov 2002 15:03:33 +0000
>From asjo@vanilla.aparte-test.dk Wed Nov 27 09:03:32 2002
Return-path: <asjo@vanilla.aparte-test.dk>
Received: from (vanilla) [194.192.21.172]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18H3ip-0003na-00; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 09:03:27 -0600
Received: by vanilla (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id AF83C57878; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:03:25 +0100 (CET)
From: "Adam Sjøgren" <asjo@vanilla.aparte-test.dk>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: The cronscript doesn't rotate logfiles defined in Included files in Included files
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:03:25 +0100
Message-Id: <20021127150325.AF83C57878@vanilla>
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: apache-perl
Version: 1.3.26-1-1.26-0woody2
Severity: wishlist
The included /etc/cron.daily/apache-perl script only finds Logfiles in
files Included directly in httpd.conf.
If one of the files Included by httpd.conf Includes further files,
and they define logfiles, those logfiles aren't rotated.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux vanilla 2.4.18 #1 SMP Fri Oct 11 13:37:15 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages apache-perl depends on:
ii apache-common 1.3.26-0woody3 Support files for all Apache webse
ii debconf 1.0.32 Debian configuration management sy
ii dpkg 1.9.21 Package maintenance system for Deb
ii libapache-mod-perl 1.26-3.0woody1 Integration of perl with the Apach
ii libc6 2.2.5-11.2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libdb2 2:2.7.7.0-7 The Berkeley database routines (ru
ii libperl5.6 5.6.1-7 Shared Perl library.
ii mime-support 3.18-1 MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 170943-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2003 16:36:58 +0000
>From willy@www.linux.org.uk Tue Oct 14 11:36:57 2003
Return-path: <willy@www.linux.org.uk>
Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk (www.linux.org.uk) [195.92.249.252]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A9SAL-0005xo-00; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 11:36:57 -0500
Received: from willy by www.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.22)
id 1A9SAK-00036r-Q2; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 17:36:56 +0100
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 17:36:56 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
To: 178288-close@bugs.debian.org, 170943-close@bugs.debian.org
Subject: We use logrotate now
Message-ID: <20031014163656.GX27861@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: <willy@www.linux.org.uk>
Delivered-To: 170943-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0
tests=none
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
These bugs can now be closed since they apply to the old custom apache
rotate scripts and not to the current logrotate style.
--
"It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk
Reply to: