On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:45:37AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Alex Samad <alex@samad.com.au> writes: > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:02:31AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >> Alex Samad <alex@samad.com.au> writes: > >> > >> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:53:14AM +0100, Francesco Pietra wrote: [snip] > > I would still argue for a separate /boot - plain old ext2, mount it ro > > until kernel upgrade, maybe store a rescue image on their, and with the > > size of disks now a days whats 500m or even 10G > > Have a 1GB / and mount it read-only. > > But if you do want a seperate /boot then put / on lvm too and move and > link /etc/lvm to /boot/lvm. There is no reason to have another > partition and raid and the benefits of lvm are there too. yes I could, but I wouldn't just piece of mind, if I waste a partition then I waste 1, again another layer of "just in case", I can easily load up 1 disk from a raid1, but trying to decide where the data is from a lvm on raid is well. > > MfG > Goswin > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-REQUEST@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org > > -- "I mean, there was a serious international effort to say to Saddam Hussein, you're a threat. And the 9/11 attacks extenuated that threat, as far as I�concerned." - George W. Bush 12/12/2005 Philadelphia, PA
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature