Re: "big" machines running Debian?
firstname.lastname@example.org (Lennart Sorensen) writes:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 05:42:43PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>> The comparison wasn't between having the raid controller or LVM present
>> a reasonable size /, it was between a reasonable size / and a 2TB /.
> No one ever wanted a 2TB /. I just wanted / on a drive that was bigger
> than 2TB and hence couldn't use dos partition tables anymore. I only
> have a 10GB / :) Making a 10GB raid volume and a seperate raid volume
> for the rest just to be able to use dos partition tables for the /
> is just awkward.
Not to repeat myself but a GPT with an entry for /boot in its fake
MS-Dos table works just fine.