Hans-J. Ullrich:
>
> May this might not the right list to ask, but can someone tell me the reason,
> why the command "hibernate" and the command "hibernate-ram" behave
> different ?
From 'man hibernate':
If the hibernate script is invoked with a name of the form
hibernate-foo then it will use the configuration file
/etc/hibernate/foo.conf instead of the default.
> This is strange, because "hibernate-ram" is just a symlink to "hibernate".
Every UNIX program knows the command line that invoked itself. That way,
a program may behave differently depending on the name of the executable
that has been launched.
> Second question: Is there a way on a multi processor system to prevent the
> system to use both cores (yes, I know, can start as a single core machine)
> and after start up using the second (and now empty cpu) for one process ?
As far as I know, you can only bind specific processed to a specific
CPU. That doesn't prevent other processes from using the same CPU, but
it really shouldn't matter performance-wise. If the process needs 100%
of its CPU's time, it will get it.
J.
--
If I could have anything in the world it would have to be more money.
[Agree] [Disagree]
<http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature