[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Intel (s775) Johannesburg DQ35JOE mATX



Len, Gudjon

On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 12:37 -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 05:15:22PM +0100, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
> >
> > Network card: Intel 82566DM Gigabit Adapter, integrated
> 
> Well looking at the 2.6.18 source code from etch for the kernel I see
> stuff like:
> ../rr1/sandbox/linux-2.6/linux-2.6-2.6.18.dfsg.1/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_hw.c: e1000_set_pci_ex_no_snoop(hw, PCI_EX_82566_SNOOP_ALL);
> so yes I think the e1000 driver should work on that chip.
> 
> The onboard video if you are using it, is a GMA3100 which from what I
> can determine requires Xorg 1.3 or higher and 2.6.22 kernel or higher.
> 
> So that means you have to use either Etch with a backported kernel, or
> testing (or unstable) to get 2.6.22 kernel and new xorg if you want
> graphics on the built in video.

You don't need a backport of the kernel packages.  They are stand alone
pieces of software that nothing depends upon and depend on nothing
themselves (in the packaging sense; I know the system needs a kernel to
run).  You can just down load the kernel packages of your choice.

I had a problem with the kernel in lenny not supporting the Nikon D40
DSLR I've just got.  Loads of stuff on the Ubuntu forums because they
shipped with a version of the kernel that was "broken".  Any way I just
installed the sid kernel set and everything just worked.

Here are the packages I got from sid:
	linux-headers-2.6.23-1-amd64		  2.6.23-2
	linux-headers-2.6.23-1-common		2.6.23-2
	linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64	           2.6.23-2
	linux-kbuild-2.6.23				    2.6.23-1

Hope this helps
Steve
-- 
Steve Dobson

If someone were to ask me for a short cut to sensuality, I would
suggest he go shopping for a used 427 Shelby-Cobra. But it is only
fair to warn you that of the 300 guys who switched to them in 1966,
only two went back to women.
-- Mort Sahl

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: