Re: starting X interferes with NFS
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 09:52:23AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 08:29:53AM -0400, hendrik@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
>
> > Not that I have any particular aversion to xorg 7.0, but if that's
> > needed it *might* be simplest to wait for it to stabilize into testing.
> > I suspect that bug reports from mixing xorg7.0 into an etch system at
> > this point would only confuse things, since it doesn't look as if it
> > was quite ready for sid yet.
>
> Actually it is lookking pretty good already. It has actually gone
> rather quick to get rid of the worst bugs in the packaging. Given it
> went to entirely modular, I am impressed.
Unfortunately, aptitude tells me:
* nvidia-glx [nonfree] depends on x11-common (>= 1:7.0.0) [UNAVAILABLE]
Evidently, it wants xorg 7.0 from sid, and not xorg 6.9 from etch.
I hope the bugs ar out and it migrates down soon.
-- hendrik
>
> > But picking up the new nvidia-glx package and seeing if it works in etch
> > might still be useful as long as I can remember how to boot without X if
> > it crashes hopelessly.
> >
> > And it probably wants a compatibly-numbered nvidia-kernel-source. I'll
> > have to get that too.
> >
> > nvidia-glx_1.0.8756-4_amd64.deb
> > nvidia-kernel-source_1.0.8756-4_amd64.deb
>
> Those would be the versions to use for that chipset. Anything older
> won't work as far as I know.
>
> Len Sorensen
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
Reply to: