[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ATI-driver will not start with 3D-acceleration (Update)



hi,

this is how my system looks like - i have working acceleration:

by the way, what does
LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose fglrxinfo
tell you? any error messages? i recall havind problems with acceleration due to wrong permissions...

> These are the paths, where I found symlinks:
> /usr/lib
> /usr/X11R6/lib
> /usr/X11R6/lib64
/usr/lib -> /usr/lib64
/usr/X11R6/lib -> /usr/X11R6/lib64

I looked into my system, and I suppose, the reaeson, why my ATI-acceleration does not work, might be due to the 64-Bit incompabiltiy. I found two different libGL.so,1.2 and two different fglrx_drv.so. These seem to be for 32-Bit and 64-Bit. So far, so good. And I found several symlinks, pointing to the different libGL.so.1.2 and fglrx_drv.so.
i have only one fglrx_drv.so, locate tells me it is residing in /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers

regarding the libGL.so* files (ls -la `locate libGL.so`):

lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2006-01-27 10:59 /emul/ia32-linux/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 -> libGL.so.1.2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 634732 2006-02-23 16:58 /emul/ia32-linux/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2006-02-06 15:22 /usr/lib/libGL.so -> libGL.so.1.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2006-02-06 15:21 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 -> libGL.so.1.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 2006-02-06 15:21 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 -> ../X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 557224 2006-01-17 06:19 /usr/share/fglrx/diversions/libGL.so.1.2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 437376 2005-02-23 10:07 /usr/share/fglrx/diversions/libGL.so.1.2_32bit lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2006-02-06 15:22 /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so -> libGL.so.1.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2006-02-06 15:21 /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 -> libGL.so.1.2
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 762480 2006-02-23 16:58 /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2

Hope, I did not forgot one. I suppose, the reason is, that the kernel-module and the fglrx-driver do not play together, due the kernel-driver is 64-bit (should be compiled this way !) and the driver 32-bit (due to wrong symlinks by the crappy ATI-installer) Could that be ?
dunno. i used ati installer (there was no driver for 6.9 available in the driver distributed by ati, so i had to use ati installer) with instructions from flavio's website and maillist...

hth,

--
Lubos
_@_"



Reply to: