I asked for the Matlab Service Pack to upgrade to 7.1 and it works fine! Thx! Am Dienstag, den 20.06.2006, 11:04 +0200 schrieb Gudjon I. Gudjonsson: > Hi again > If you are using matlab 7.0.x you can install it in an sarge, amd64 chroot > but if you do have the 7.1 version it works perfectly on Debian amd64, sarge, > etch and sid and you don't need any chroot. > > /Gudjon > > Þann Þriðjudagur 20. júní 2006 10:16 skrifaði Markus Neviadomski: > > Am Dienstag, den 20.06.2006, 00:40 +0200 schrieb Gudjon I. Gudjonsson: > > > Hi > > > Hope I am nod off topic but I changed to schroot, many months ago and > > > my do_chroot script looks like > > > #!/bin/sh > > > ARGS="" > > > for i in "$@" ; do > > > ARGS="$ARGS '$i'" > > > done > > > > > > exec schroot -p -c sid "`basename $0`" "$ARGS" > > > > > > and it works perfectly. The schroot must be set up though but the config > > > file is quite self explanatory. > > > > Hi Gudjon, > > > > I've seen the schroot-package during the last upgrade, but i spent no > > time to read the man-page for this tool. Now, after reading, I think > > this is much better than the old dchroot command. > > > > I takes some minutes to set it up, because my matlab-installation also > > won't work with my old dchroot. > > > > Thanks a lot, > > Markus > > > > > /Gudjon > > > > > > Þann Þriðjudagur 20. júní 2006 00:18 skrifaði Markus Neviadomski: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > after upgrading my amd64/unstable with ia32-chroot(also unstable) the > > > > chroot-script from > > > > https://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.h > > > >tml# id272095 doesn't work. I used it for calling OpenOffice from > > > > outside the chroot. > > > > > > > > I'm not shure whether the change was in the way the script interprets > > > > the calling parameter or the changes where made in chroot environment. > > > > > > > > After the upgrade the script passes the following command to the chroot > > > > <ooffice 'file.odt'> but only this command works: <ooffice file.odt> > > > > > > > > Starting OpenOffice without any parameter wasn't affected. > > > > > > > > Would anybody approve this behavior? In the following is the script > > > > with the changes I made: > > > > > > > > <<<< > > > > #!/bin/sh > > > > ARGS="" > > > > for i in "$@" ; do > > > > ARGS="$ARGS$i" > > > > done > > > > echo "`basename $0`" "$ARGS" > > > > > > > > exec dchroot -c ia32 -d -q "`basename $0`" "$ARGS" > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Markus Neviadomski mailto: mn@dieitexperten.de > > > > WWW: www.dieitexperten.de > > > > Linux User #291181 > > > > GPG-Key: 0xF5226EB5 > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil