Re: amd-64 vs Pure-64

To: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: amd-64 vs Pure-64
From: sigi <dugongs@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:46:56 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050930154656.GA5740@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050930142423.GA21812@rene-engelhard.de>
References: <43159078.2080106@isotrol.com> <[🔎] 200509011637.28962.lepalom@wol.es> <[🔎] 1125591339.12720.15.camel@debsim.localnet> <[🔎] 200509012326.20229.lepalom@wol.es> <[🔎] 1125611357.12720.21.camel@debsim.localnet> <[🔎] 20050930142423.GA21812@rene-engelhard.de>

Hi,
 
> > The openoffice 1.9 is unstable (beta). Effectively openoffice crashes
> > sometimes. I don't know if the openoffice 1.1 can be recompiled.
> 
> "Sometimes" is quite a understatement.
 
[...]
 
> If there's amd64 OOo debs around  they are usually the 32bit stuff.

is it imaginable, when the OpenOffice-port to amd64 will be finished? 

I don't want to make a chroot-environment, and I really don't like other 
offices like koffice - they are not as good as OOo...

regards,
sigi

Reply to:

References:
- Re: amd-64 vs Pure-64
  - From: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <lepalom@wol.es>
- Re: amd-64 vs Pure-64
  - From: Stefano Simonucci <stefano.simonucci@tin.it>
- Re: amd-64 vs Pure-64
  - From: Leopold Palomo Avellaneda <lepalom@wol.es>
- Re: amd-64 vs Pure-64
  - From: Stefano Simonucci <stefano.simonucci@tin.it>
- Re: amd-64 vs Pure-64
  - From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: amd-64 vs Pure-64
Next by Date: anybody got the working?
Previous by thread: Re: amd-64 vs Pure-64
Next by thread: Re: Re: amd-64 vs Pure-64
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread