On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 03:27 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> writes: > > > On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 13:36 -0400, David Wood wrote: > >> On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Adam Stiles wrote: [snip] > >> > >> 2) We believe that C/C++ is usually magically portable across hardware > >> architectures. > > > > Well, you did say usually... > > > > Perfect example of non-portable C/C++ code: OOo. > > OOo is C, C++, asm, java, python, perl, ... and many more. Java *and* assembly. That's.... amusing, in a sick, sad, perverted manner. > > It's not in the debian-openoffice archives yet, but the latest > > message from this thread says that OOo2 might not ship 64-bit > > native. > > During the LinuxTag several people told me that tries on 64bit > just resulted in crashes, e.g. when opening any file. If only OOo had been written in Python & PyGTK... ;) -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail. "It may not always be easy, convenient, or politically correct to stand for truth and right, but it is the right thing to do. Always." M. Russell Ballard
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part