[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: nforce4, Harddisk SATA, DVD-Burner ATAPI: How can I keep ide-scsi from loading?



On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 08:10:19PM +0200, K. Gysin wrote:
> oberon@Nasqueron:~/evolution_cvs$ cat /etc/modules
> # /etc/modules: kernel modules to load at boot time.
> #
> # This file should contain the names of kernel modules that are
> # to be loaded at boot time, one per line.  Comments begin with
> # a "#", and everything on the line after them are ignored.
> 
> amd74xx
> #ide-cd
> #ide-disk
> #ide-generic
> #psmouse
> #sbp2
> #sd_mod
> #sr_mod
> nvidia

Loading ide-cd in there is generally a good idea, otherwise anything
that tries to access the cd thorugh scsi first might make it load
ide-scsi.  ide-generic may also be needed.

> hmm.. root is /dev/sda5 (in the normal case). It does not load any SATA
> drivers though, as far as I can see.

Does lsmod show any sata or ata drivers that might be sata?

> nforce4, amd74xx
> 
> 0000:00:06.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK804 IDE (rev a2)
> 0000:00:07.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK804 Serial ATA
> Controller (rev a3)
> 0000:00:08.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK804 Serial ATA
> Controller (rev a3)

Hmm, I haven't used that one, so I am not sure how it behaves.

> Hmm... sata_nv is supposed to be libata.

Yes that should be sata.  That is what I use on my nforce2 board.

> libata
> sata_nv

Looks reasonable.  On the nforce2 my /etc/mkinitrd/modules contains
just:
ide-cd

That's it.  The rest the mkinitrd scans for correctly.

> as stated above, the behavior is the same as with the standard kernel.
> 
> Yes... that is also the state I get when I boot with knoppix (which uses
> 2.6.11).
> 
> So, do you think there is another module loaded beforehand which is wrong? How could I check that?

Try adding ide-cd and ide-generic to /etc/modules to make sure they load
early in boot.  Maybe that will fix it (that is I believe how the debian
installer tends to set it up by default).

Len Sorensen



Reply to: