[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Asus A8V Deluxe, Xfree display problems with BIOS 1011



Le 06.05.2005 20:40:28, Lennart Sorensen a écrit :
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 02:45:02PM +0000, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)
wrote:
> Yes, you are right, but this upgrade is for the support for the new
ad
> core (Venice). So this means we are stuck with the running
processor.
> Or maybe there will be an other fix later ...

Try asking ATI.  Maybe if ATI asks asus someone will work something
out
since without sources (which ati has) you can't tell what is going
wrong
in the driver really.  I imagine it is some simple setting they got
wrong in the new bios.  Or perhaps you have to set a new option
different than the default in the new bios.

No, I've took care to set exactly the same options (as long as there are available, but it was at least the case for the AGP stuff).

Maybe I've to try the fglrx drivers before asking ATI. I think it will be the next step.


> Ubuntu use xorg instead of xfree, the driver is "ati" (BTW, "ati"
> doesnt work on my system both with 64 and 32 bit, I've to use
"radeon").

Is there a radeon driver on ubuntu?  If so does it break too?

I cannot remember. I have used a live CD and the card is autodetected. BTW, radeon is not an option when you install xfree86 in Debian, it is ati. I've read somewhere that both are identical, but I've not the same result with both of them.


> What I did. But this is not a long term solution. And the politic of

> Asus is not acceptable. 1009 is not bug free. i.e. : try the auto
> overclocking mode.. Other problem : if I left agp fastwrite to
enabled,
> I get a machine check.

Well it is certainly not a good move on their part.  Linux users might
stop recomending Asus, which I know a lot have been, since they have
generally been very well built and very well supported.

And they cannot report the problem to the graphic card maker: I've an ASUS too ;-)


> The changelog for the ASUS BIOS doesnt represent the changes. Many
> other things have been changed : the way the DDR is managed, some
> options have beed added, other suppressed...

I agree the changelogs are pathetic for their bios upgrades.

> This is what I did and if you refer to my previous post they reply
tehy
> have no UNIX/linux support.
>
> And I consider *this* is the worse in ths problem..

It would be a shame if one of the best motherboard vendors end up
going
down because of that kind of attitude.

Does it affect the ati windows drivers I wonder... :)

Unfortunately it probably doesn't.

I've no windows to test. Maybe it that would need a try.... just after testing the fglrx.


Len Sorensen

J-L

Attachment: pgpHrSQ9hwOEo.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: