Re: powernowd / stock kernels
I wouldn't say I "prefer" powernowd, per se, but I know that powernowd
is made for AMD, whereas cpudynd is more generic (afaik). That being
said, I use cpudynd in my thinkpad (X40) and it works very well.
Javier Kohen wrote:
is there any reason why you prefer powernowd to cpudyn? I was
wondering because I'm using the later on my notebook. I barely use it
on batteries, but I like the noise reduction that comes with the
Zachary Rizer wrote:
Aha! You're right.
Works like a charm here as well.
Thank you Thomas!
--- "T.J. Zeeman" <email@example.com> wrote:
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 11:06 -0800, Zachary Rizer
Please disregard previous email -- I just realized
powernowd is only on XP-M processors, and that
I'm looking for is "Cool 'n Quiet".
Actually, no mistake at all. I have an AMD64 and run
powernowd to have
cpu-scaling (as provided by the CnQ-feature in the
I got it to run on a Debian kernel-image after I put
cpufreq-userspace in /etc/modules. It was apparently
necessary to have
these loaded forcedly to get the powernowd daemon to
"Firefox is both more secure and more modern than IE [Internet Explorer], and it comes packed with user-friendly features the Microsoft browser can't touch."
-- Walt Mossberg, The Wall Street Journal.
Find out what all the fuss is about: Get Mozilla Firefox.