[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Success report: installing pure64 on a dell poweredge 1850



Apparently the 2.8GHz nocona is slower than the 1.8GHz Opteron.

Compiled with 'make CC=gcc-3.4'.

BYTEmark* Native Mode Benchmark ver. 2 (10/95)
Index-split by Andrew D. Balsa (11/97)
Linux/Unix* port by Uwe F. Mayer (12/96,11/97)

TEST                : Iterations/sec.  : Old Index   : New Index
                    :                  : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
NUMERIC SORT        :          1403.8  :      36.00  :      11.82
STRING SORT         :          161.06  :      71.96  :      11.14
BITFIELD            :      3.6503e+08  :      62.62  :      13.08
FP EMULATION        :          133.76  :      64.18  :      14.81
FOURIER             :           15532  :      17.66  :       9.92
ASSIGNMENT          :          19.076  :      72.59  :      18.83
IDEA                :          3333.3  :      50.98  :      15.14
HUFFMAN             :          1372.3  :      38.05  :      12.15
NEURAL NET          :          25.598  :      41.12  :      17.30
LU DECOMPOSITION    :          944.64  :      48.94  :      35.34
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX       : 54.706
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 32.879
Baseline (MSDOS*)   : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
==============================LINUX DATA BELOW===============================
CPU                 : Dual AuthenticAMD AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 244 1793MHz
L2 Cache            : 1024 KB
OS                  : Linux 2.6.7-5-amd64-k8-smp
C compiler          : gcc-3.4
libc                : ld-2.3.2.so
MEMORY INDEX        : 13.998
INTEGER INDEX       : 13.397
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 18.236
Baseline (LINUX)    : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3, libc-5.4.38
* Trademarks are property of their respective holder.

-- 
    Karl Hegbloom
(o_  mailto:hegbloom@pdx.edu
//\   jabber:karlheg@jabber.org
V_/_   yahoo:karlheg




Reply to: