[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Success report: installing pure64 on a dell poweredge 1850



On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 14:10, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I had the chance to test the installation of pure64 on a dell poweredge 
> 1850 with "nocona" xeons, and I only can say: it works like a charm. 
> This system will presumably run sarge for amd64 as soon as it is 
> released.

We have a Nocona Dell Precision Workstation that also boots the amd64
port.

> TEST                : Iterations/sec.  : Old Index   : New Index
>                     :                  : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
> --------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
> NUMERIC SORT        :          923.36  :      23.68  :       7.78
> STRING SORT         :          118.88  :      53.12  :       8.22
> BITFIELD            :      3.4425e+08  :      59.05  :      12.33
> FP EMULATION        :          125.88  :      60.40  :      13.94
> FOURIER             :           12468  :      14.18  :       7.96
> ASSIGNMENT          :          22.785  :      86.70  :      22.49
> IDEA                :          2697.5  :      41.26  :      12.25
> HUFFMAN             :          1619.6  :      44.91  :      14.34
> NEURAL NET          :          16.017  :      25.73  :      10.82
> LU DECOMPOSITION    :          507.28  :      26.28  :      18.98
> ==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================
> INTEGER INDEX       : 49.428
> FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 21.244
> Baseline (MSDOS*)   : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler
> 10.0
> ==============================LINUX DATA BELOW===============================
> C compiler          : gcc-3.4 (unknown version)
> libc                : unknown version
> MEMORY INDEX        : 13.163
> INTEGER INDEX       : 11.747
> FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 11.783
> Baseline (LINUX)    : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3, libc-5.4.38
> * Trademarks are property of their respective holder.

Who can resist this? ;)  On Athlon64 3400+ 1024K cache, gcc 3.4

TEST                : Iterations/sec.  : Old Index   : New Index
                    :                  : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
NUMERIC SORT        :          1685.8  :      43.23  :      14.20
STRING SORT         :          197.92  :      88.44  :      13.69
BITFIELD            :       4.627e+08  :      79.37  :      16.58
FP EMULATION        :           162.4  :      77.93  :      17.98
FOURIER             :           18897  :      21.49  :      12.07
ASSIGNMENT          :          23.215  :      88.34  :      22.91
IDEA                :          4043.1  :      61.84  :      18.36
HUFFMAN             :          1673.3  :      46.40  :      14.82
NEURAL NET          :          31.163  :      50.06  :      21.06
LU DECOMPOSITION    :          1149.3  :      59.54  :      42.99
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX       : 66.894
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 40.010
Baseline (MSDOS*)   : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
==============================LINUX DATA BELOW===============================
CPU                 : AuthenticAMD AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3400+ 2194MHz
L2 Cache            : 1024 KB
OS                  : Linux 2.6.7-5-amd64-k8-smp
C compiler          : gcc-3.4
libc                : 
MEMORY INDEX        : 17.324
INTEGER INDEX       : 16.234
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 22.191
Baseline (LINUX)    : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3, libc-5.4.38



Reply to: