Re: GCC pure64 for building numeric stuff and GCC
- To: Alex Perry <email@example.com>
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: GCC pure64 for building numeric stuff and GCC
- From: Tom Vier <email@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 12:29:48 -0500
- Message-id: <20040321172948.GA429@zero>
- Reply-to: Tom Vier <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- In-reply-to: <20040320232507.GA13985@qm.com>
- References: <20040314173914.GB6415@zero> <20040314194051.GA18628@qm.com> <20040314215425.GA6836@zero> <40553C95.email@example.com> <20040317000547.GA21030@zero> <40579D7F.firstname.lastname@example.org> <20040320022208.GA31779@zero> <405BBD78.email@example.com> <20040320203639.GA1934@zero> <20040320232507.GA13985@qm.com>
i'm sending this to the list, so other people can weigh in.
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 03:25:07PM -0800, Alex Perry wrote:
> Because, since I sent that to you, I actually tried the kernel it built.
i finally got one built using woody+alioth+gcc.bart, but it doesn't boot
either. it dies in init, in sysfs_create_somethingorother. someone on
#debian-amd64 said that 2.6.4's x86 compat code is broken, and that
2.6.5-rc2 works. 2.6.5-rc2 is what i tried, though. the sysfs call trace
seems to tell that it isn't even loading init yet. i'm pretty sure that the
kernel mounts /sys itself, not init, but i could be wrong. maybe the compat
code is still broken, or maybe it's alioth's biarch.
Tom Vier <firstname.lastname@example.org>
DSA Key ID 0x15741ECE