* Paul Brook (paul@codesourcery.com) wrote: > > > > b) It's not clear that the 64bit only archive will ever be an > > > > official part of the archive... > > > > > > Indeed. I just wanted to point this out early so we don't get any > > > "invalid instruction" bug reports in half a year. > > > > Half a year seems *extremely* optimistic, and, really, I think this is > > an upstream issue anyway... > > It has already been fixed in upstream gcc 3.5 (CVS HEAD), 3.4.0-pre and 3.3.4. > 3.2 is old, unmaintained, and doesn't work particularly well on x86-64 > anyway. Good, then it'll get picked up when sid moves to one of the fixed versions. We really don't want to deviate from what sid's got for a variety of reasons... Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature