Re: Concerns about AMD64 port
Kyle Rose <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > Because there's no gain for some packages, and it wastes mirror
> > space. Some packages, like say a window manager, really don't need
> > more than 2G RAM, and are not time critical either.
> I don't think you're taking the proper perspective. If every "not
> time critical" application is 10% less efficient than it could be, a
> typical desktop user could see serious degradation in
Responsiveness of simple desktop application is typically not
CPU-bound. Anyway, I can't really notice even the slightest delay in
anything I do with my window manager even on this crappy 500MHz
Sparc. But that wasn't really my point, if you don't like window
manager, take for example aumix.