[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: SMP-DS20 (DP264) beginner problems



On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 06:56:22PM +0100, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > Ah.  In that case, could you give us the exact version of the kernel image
> > package you have installed,

> kernel-image-2.6.8-2-smp        2.6.8-16sarge1

> > and the error message you get trying to load
> > this module?

> The last screenful of complete messages is

> module scsi_mod: Relocation overflow vs section 23
> WARNING: Error inserting scsi_mod
> (/lib/modules/2.6.8-2-smp/kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.ko): Invalid
> module format
> sd_mod: Unknown symbol scsi_device_get
> sd_mod: Unknown symbol scsi_wait_req
> ...
> sd_mod: Unknown symbol scsi_io_completion
> sd_mod: Unknown symbol scsi_set_medium_removal
> FATAL: Error inserting sd_mod
> (/lib/modules/2.6.8-2-smp/kernel/drivers/scsi/sd_mod.ko): Unknown symbol
> in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg)
> pivot_root: No such file or directory
> /sbin/init: 432: cannot open dev/console: No such file
> Kernel panic: Attempted to kill init!
> 
> Above that is a partial message for aic7xxx.ko. Looks like it cannot
> load any module from the initrd, it doesn't seem to be specific to the
> sym53c875 controller.

What versions of busybox and module-init-tools do you have installed, and do
you have mkinitrd-tools configured to use busybox in your initrd?

> kernel-image-2.6.8-2-generic    2.6.8-16sarge1

> does boot successfully. We got an endless loop of "__find_get_block_slow failed"
> messages once, but I cannot reproduce this now.

> Maybe I should just rebuild the initrd for the smp kernel?

Possibly.  I only have UP alpha systems, so I have no idea about the
usability of the -smp package.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: