[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Why not use GCC 3.0?

On 07.Mar.02-16:28, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> >On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> >
> I know personnaly (physically) at least three Alpha owners (including 
> myself) under Linux (or willing to).
not yet a great number, but please add one more;

no way to compile 2.4.17 with 2.95/3.0: a lot of "undefined reference
to ..." with O0 and all this with O2 (long lines wrapped):

make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/block'
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes\
    -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing \
    -fno-common -pipe -mno-fp-regs -ffixed-8 -mcpu=ev5 -Wa,-mev6\
    -c -o DAC960.o DAC960.c
DAC960.c: In function `DAC960_V2_EnableMemoryMailboxInterface':
DAC960.c:1053: internal error--unrecognizable insn:
(insn 1044 1040 481 (set (reg:DI 16 $16)
        (plus:DI (reg:DI 30 $30)
            (const_int 4398046511104 [0x40000000000]))) -1 (nil)
cpp0: output pipe has been closed
make[3]: *** [DAC960.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/block'
make[2]: *** [first_rule] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/block'
make[1]: *** [_subdir_block] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers'
make: *** [_dir_drivers] Error 2

Obviously, running like a charm with:

Linux x.x.x 2.2.19 #5 Wed Feb 16 20:13:38 CET 2002 alpha unknown


Reply to: