Re: aptitude on alpha (again, sigh)

[Falk Hueffner <falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de>]

Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org> writes:

>   Can anyone reproduce/hunt down 114270?  I can't reproduce it (I think
> it's probably Alpha specific), and I don't really have much of an
> idea where it could be.  I haven't gotten any other reports of this,
> which makes me wonder if maybe it could be the reporter's system.

I can't reproduce this with version 0.2.7.1-1. Instead, it starts
eating all memory when hitting return on a package, of course because
of an unsigned int compared against string::npos (didn't we have this
before a few times?)

(The "comparison between signed and unsigned" warning of gcc is
*EVIL*. It makes people fuck up their code. Don't listen to it. Use
plain int.)

        Falk