Re: Why wouldn't gcc release build on Alpha ?
> That's easy, just type: "apt-get source glibc". It gets the original source,
Well, not that fast :-)
wit379215:/home/andrei# apt-get source glibc
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
E: Sorry, you must put some 'source' uris in your sources.list
Will need to do some editing.
> patch, signed file from the maintainer with both md5sums (".dsc"), and unpacks and
> patches the source.
?? - was the patch which Chris sent included already too,
or what patches do you mean - only those which were used
to compile the current glibc 2.2. in unstable ?
> All of the new packages have been put in debian/pool(/main/g/glibc).
Ok, now I can find it, many thanks for your help !
> Some made it
> into woody/testing before the pool, but you'll notice there's nothing in sid/unstable,
> all of the Packages listings are either in the dists/woody, dists/potato or pool
> Surf around a bit, look at Contents.gz and Packages(.gz) files,
I indeed looked in Packages, but the description seemed to be a bit short ?
> what you find may
> impress you. Isn't Debian cool? :-)
> -Adam P.
> GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
> Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe!