Re: anyone successful in compiling kernel 2.4.0-testx ?
Ah...sound Blaster live. Well, I haven't looked at the code....but FWIW
I'd use Alsa. When I did the sound card testing in the UP1000 that's what
we used.
We've recently sent some machines to Alsa so things should be looking
good.
--rdp
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Rich Payne wrote:
>
> > More good news....I'm now running XWindows with a usb mouse on the UP1100
> > :)
> >
> > It took a little work (like reading the USB docs...) but it seems to work
> > fine. I gpm going as well.
>
> That is good news! Wow! Wish I had USB on my SX now :-P I know the
> controller is built-in, but there's no header :-(
>
> > Which soundcard was/is causing the problem?
>
> Here's the section of his config related to the sound board selection:
>
> #
> # Sound
> #
> CONFIG_SOUND=y
> # CONFIG_SOUND_CMPCI is not set
> CONFIG_SOUND_EMU10K1=y
> # CONFIG_SOUND_FUSION is not set
> # CONFIG_SOUND_ES1370 is not set
> # CONFIG_SOUND_ES1371 is not set
> # CONFIG_SOUND_ESSSOLO1 is not set
> # CONFIG_SOUND_MAESTRO is not set
> # CONFIG_SOUND_SONICVIBES is not set
> # CONFIG_SOUND_TRIDENT is not set
> # CONFIG_SOUND_MSNDCLAS is not set
> # CONFIG_SOUND_MSNDPIN is not set
> # CONFIG_SOUND_VIA82CXXX is not set
> # CONFIG_SOUND_OSS is not set
> # CONFIG_SOUND_TVMIXER is not set
>
> And here's the error (in case you want to find it...after a quick grep,
> it's pretty obvious why it's barfing):
>
> ecard.c: In function `emu10k1_ecard_init':
> ecard.c:138: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> ecard.c:138: `TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE' undeclared (first
> use in this function)
> ecard.c:138: (Each undeclared identifier is reported
> only once
> ecard.c:138: for each function it appears in.)
> ecard.c:139: warning: implicit declaration of function
> `schedule_timeout'
> make[5]: *** [ecard.o] Error 1
> make[5]: Leaving directory
> `/usr/src/linux/drivers/sound/emu10k1'
> make[4]: *** [first_rule] Error 2
>
> C
>
>
>
--
Rich Payne
rpayne@alphalinux.org www.alphalinux.org
Reply to: