ReRe: Alphastation 250 and ISDN
> Hi,
>
> so far so good. Got the patches and started 'std2kern' and all went fine.
>
> But when i try to compile the 2.2.3 kernel now i get lotsa errors. Lotsa
> definitions cannot be found. isdn.h does a parse error in line 82 and so on.
> I'm using isdn-9903291200 and isdn4k-utils-9903291200. I also tried the patches and
> utils from 03/03/99.
>
> bye,
> Harry
>
> Michele Comitini wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Try using a 2.2.3 kernel with the patches from ftp.suse.com/pub/isdn4linux
> > maybe you could get an updated version of isdnutils from the same site.
> > That worked very good for me, much better than 2.0.36.
> >
> > Good luck!
> >
> > Ciao!
> >
> > On 28-Mar-99 Harry Gaenslein wrote:
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > System: Alphastation 250
> > > 96 MByte RAM
> > > Latest Firmware
> > > Debian 2.1 (slink)
> > >
> > > i successfully installed my AVM Fritz ISDN-Card on my Alpha. The module
> > > installs just fine.
> > >
> > > But...when i run 'isdnctrl addif ippp0' i get the following error:
> > >
> > > isdnctrl: Exception at [<fffffc0000454200>] (fffffc0000454320)
> > > isdnctrl: Exception at [<fffffc0000454324>] (fffffc000045431c)
> > > addif: bad address
> > >
> > > The odd thing is: ippp0 is there afterwards. Though the system tells me
> > > that the machine doesn't have syncppp support. But I marked the option
> > > when compiling the new kernel. I tried make config, make menuconfig and
> > > even make xconfig. I even tried different graphiccards.
> > > I also compiled different versions of isdnutils. Every version gave the
> > > same error back.
> > >
> > > Please help a confused and poor ISDN-User.
> > >
> > > bye,
> > > Harry
> > >
> > > -----
> > > Harry Gaenslein, Germany
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org
> > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > -------------------------
> > E-Mail: Michele Comitini <mcm@glisco.it>
> > Michele Comitini
> > Glisco s.a.s.
> > -------------------------
Reply to: