Re: Glibc 2.1?
>>>>> "CCC" == Christopher C Chimelis <email@example.com> writes:
CCC> Out of curiosity, has anyone compiled the pre's for glibc 2.1
CCC> yet? I tried awhile ago and the build died. Just wondering
CCC> how much farther things had gone since then....
Is moving to glibc 2.1 a long term goal for potato? I used to run
2.1 a long, long time ago, and there's too much nifty stuff (/dev/pts,
for one) to leave it alone. I'd play with it, but I'm 3000km away from
my alpha for the rest of the week.
- Glibc 2.1?
- From: Christopher C Chimelis <firstname.lastname@example.org>