Re: glibc and egcs....
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Loic Prylli wrote:
> I was thinking there was a consensus glibc must contain
> register_frame_info, as opposed to the crtbegin.o that should not
> reference it (or if it reference it, it must contains a weak
> definition as I proposed originally)
> so:
> - programs build even after now can run on any system (whereas glibc
> has the symbol or not).
> - programs that for some reason depends on it (such as all that are built
> with our current egcs) can run on an uptodate system..
Ok...the prior messages must have confused me. I'm going to see how this
build of egcs goes (it's running now). So, let's see if my dense mind
gets it this time: apply HJL's "12" patch AND the one you sent, right?
C
Reply to: