[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Patch for smail



On Wed 27 Jan 1999, Bart Warmerdam wrote:

> I patched smail for alignments errors and send the patch to the maintainer.

Hmm, you should have sent the patch to the BTS, that way there is some
form of record that you did it. Now he could claim he never received
it, if he wanted to be evil :-)

> Since I got no response this month I think he is not going to incorporate it
> for us. Do you think I should do a binary-only NMU and send the patch to BTS
> or wait until the maintainer picks up on this (eventually sending a bug when
> he still doesn't respond)??

I'd do a sourceful NMU, if the maintainer hasn't responded for a
month... Be kind and also upload an i386 version if you can :-)


Paul Slootman
-- 
home: paul@wurtel.demon.nl | work: paul@murphy.nl | debian: paul@debian.org
http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software,   Enschede,   the Netherlands


Reply to: