Re: Maybe alpha should be in hamm? (was: Re: Only m68k and i386 in hamm?)

[James Troup <J.J.Troup@scm.brad.ac.uk>]

Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman@law.miami.edu> writes:

> [ ... ] ld.so doesn't apply [ ... ]

Upgrade your quinn-diff :-)  From 0.31's ChangeLog.main :-

| Sun Apr 12 21:33:14 1998  James Troup  <jjtroup@comp.brad.ac.uk>
| 
|         * Packages-arch-specific (ldso): exclude alpha.

(Maybe it should also be excluded for the other glibc only
architectures too? I always welcome input on Packages-arch-specific as
I'm only qualified to speak for m68k (and then only barely))

-- 
James


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org