Re: Maybe alpha should be in hamm? (was: Re: Only m68k and i386 in hamm?)
James Troup <J.J.Troup@scm.brad.ac.uk> writes:
> Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman@law.miami.edu> writes:
> > [ ... ] ld.so doesn't apply [ ... ]
> Upgrade your quinn-diff :-) From 0.31's ChangeLog.main :-
Yeah, but I've been meaning to feed back my changes in one block
rather than in dribs and drabs, no time, etc.
> (Maybe it should also be excluded for the other glibc only
> architectures too? I always welcome input on Packages-arch-specific as
> I'm only qualified to speak for m68k (and then only barely))
Probably?
Mike.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: