Re: Mozilla available for testing... (BAD lib naming conventions?)
On Thu, 12 Nov 1998, Christopher C Chimelis wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Nov 1998, Bob McElrath wrote:
>
> > I get the following error message:
> > libstdc++-libc6.0-1.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> > do you have your libraries named funny?
>
> Nope...that should be the latest from the latest egcs package. If you
> haven't installed the libstdc++2.9 package from the egcs-2.91.58 debs, you
> probably don't have the new naming scheme.
I upgraded to libstdc++2.9.0 (from rpm's, of course), in case that was the
problem. And made the appropriate symbolic link.
> Considering that you've converted the package, it's probably because our
> egcs is patched to fix the libs to the new naming convention (which will
> be part of the next release from my understanding).
This seems like a dangerous thing to do. All a person has to do is compile
their own egcs, and then anything they compile with it will break because it
can't find the right libs. Also, anything not *specifically* compiled for
debian will break because it can't find the right libs. i.e. things
distrubuted in .tar.gz formats...
Also things compiled as .deb won't work on non-debian systems...
This seems very dangerous...
> > But after making an appropriate symbolic link, it just seg. faults.
> >
> > LX164, kernel 2.1.126, 256M RAM, RedHat 5.1 (heavily modified -- I used
> > alien to convert your package).
>
> Ah, ok. Thanks for the test. :-) If you get a chance, can you send me
> some output from strace on it?
It was huge, so I didn't attach it. Grab it at:
ftp://draal.physics.wisc.edu/pub/mozilla/mozilla.deb.strace.log
-- Bob
./'^`\._./'~`\._./'~`\._./'~`\._./'#`\._./'~`\._./'~`\._./'~`\._./'^`\.
/ Rube Goldberg? Bah! Amateur! I give you..Windows 98! Linux everywhere \
| Linux, because everyone's work is mission critical. ANYTHING inside. |
|_Bob McElrath (mcelrath@wisconsin.cern.ch) Univ. of Wisconsin at Madison_|
\.___________________________________________________________________./
Reply to: