On Thu, 29 Oct 1998, Guenter Geiger wrote: > There was just a message by Jay Estabrook, that the 2.1.126 should be good, even for SMP. > I´m not sure about the status of our egcs though. I'm getting ready to resurrect the 1.0.3 series of egcs to use as an "alternate" gcc (ie. like egcc on the x86's). At least that's my plan. I don't think I'll find many objections to that here ;-) C